more movies. Without going any further, Disney comes to copy itself, as evidenced by this picture:
But that's not all. Disney was also accused of plagiarism by the possible connection of the Disney movie, The Lion King with Kimba the White Lion, Japanese film of the 1960's. Fans in Japan and the United States requested that the Company will recognize the use of Disney characters and events of the Japanese production in the film. The situation remained as controversial because the Disney Company's statements that no one in the company had heard of Kimba until after The Lion King was dropped - despite the fact that some people involved in the production of the film character referred to as "Kimba". As we can see, there are many frames with too many similarities: forum At some argue that it is not plagiarism, saying the main theme Acad film is different: While (say) that the subject is giving The Lion King occupy our rightful place in the cycle of life without breaking the balance of Nature (Simba confronts his past to assume the throne rightful inheritance. And then it must ensure the preservation of the harmony of nature, which of course is both beautiful and cruel), "substantially" in Kimba is doing what is right even if we must pass over the natural laws: Kimba becomes vegetarian, and wants the animals to live in peace with humans without predators among them. At the end comes for humans to slaughter and eat his flesh. And here is when they speak of "inspiration", which I did not get to fully understand, because I still think that although the argument is different, and much as it "has inspired" by another film, frames are practically modeled. THE issue of the trial was for more. According to Jorge Cortell, the author threatened to sue Disney for plagiarism, but it seems that the man had the company in bankruptcy (or something) and as a legal defense in the U.S. is expensive (one million $) reached an agreement to which he would not claim for infringement of copyright and Disney
change would not report to the author for defamation (WTF?
!).
0 comments:
Post a Comment